With that in mind, it’s pretty needless to say that heel slippages or other unwanted movements are not an issue with the Nike Zoom Freak 3. It really starts with the snug fit, which keeps you in place at all times. Additionally, I liked the interior padding and molding in the rear area, which did not only feel comfortable but also helped with keeping my feet in position. Wide footers might also want to consider going with their true size, as this model offers a bit more room compared to its predecessor. I would definitely suggest going true to size. However, if you need a softer setup, these might not be the right model for you.Įven though these were a bit snug around the forefoot in the beginning, that feeling got better over time and the shoe actually fit perfectly after a short break-in period. I definitely felt quick and light on my feet in these. In terms of court feel, this was actually pretty good as the whole setup is meant to be low to the ground. So not necessarily the softest landing but still decent impact protection in my opinion. In general though, the foam surrounding the Zoom units is once again on the firmer side and does not offer too much compression. The forefoot provided a good amount of bounce and felt like an upgrade compared to the forefoot setup of the Nike Zoom Freak 2. And in my opinion, that‘s pretty much what they do. I would not suggest taking them on the blacktop.įrom a tech standpoint, the 3s feature two Zoom units under the ball of the foot that should “help absorb energy and provide responsiveness” according to Nike. The combination of this specific traction pattern and rubber compound does a solid job but seems pretty soft. Just be prepared to wipe every now and then as dust is being picked up quite easily. A harder bite would have been great but it never came to the point where I would actually slide out. After that, the shoe actually performed quite solidly and I did not have any major problems running the floor. I had the feeling, the outsole needed to get rid of one or two layers of rubber until it could really provide some consistency. Traction was a bit inconsistent in the beginning. Fans of premiums will however still be disappointed by the Freak series, but be assured that these will get the job done even without leathers and suedes and will do so straight out of the box. This combination of mesh and fuse felt very comfortable on foot and worked pretty well with any kinds of movements. That concern turned out to be unfounded though, as the setup actually offered good durability while being thin and lightweight. The toe box in particular left me a bit worried in terms of longevity. The first thing I noticed was how thin the materials in some areas felt. Although still a lightweight, you can see a little bit of a trend in this series, as some extra weight has been added with each Freak version so far. Looking at further tech specs, this model comes in at 367 g. While the top looks pretty familiar, the bottom with its slightly decoupled outsole provides some differentiation compared to the 2‘s shape. Looking at the silhouette, Nike went with a low cut similar to its direct predecessor. In terms of colorways, be once again prepared to see lots of different color options for this one □. Oh, you know how much I was digging that on the first ANTETOKOUNMPO □. Just as much as the return of the reverse Swoosh. Coming in popping accent colors, this definitely adds an interesting twist to its overall look. Giannis bringing out the midfoot strap delivers the most obvious visual update of the new Freak shoe. Let’s kick it off and have a closer look at the Finals MVP’s latest signature sneaker, the Nike Zoom Freak 3! Yes, we have exciting times ahead of us □□. KICKZ Fam, how have you been? After a brief summer break, we are finally back and are rolling into a new season of performance basketball shoes □.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |